Tags: What Is A Formal Outline For A Research PaperHomework TutoringCause And Effect Essay Yahoo AnswersEssays On Hiv In AfricaContents Of Accident Report BookNationality Vs Individuality EssayEssay Questions On Waiting For GodotHuman Resources Consulting Business PlanThesis And AbstractSearch Princeton Thesis
So, again, a specific point system is not acceptable, but subtle consideration is.
It follows other changes in Justice Department policy on voting rights, gay rights and police reforms…..
The Supreme Court has ruled that the educational benefits that flow from having a diverse student body can justify using race as one factor among many in a “holistic” evaluation, while rejecting blunt racial quotas or race-based point systems.
The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.
The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on “investigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.” The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the division’s front office, where the Trump administration’s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.
Of those who accepted their admission offers, 22.7% self-reported as Asian-American, 14.5% as African-Americans, 10.8% as Latino and 2.3% as Native American and Native Hawaiian.
Lawyers for Students for Fair Admissions say their goal is to reach the Supreme Court and overturn racial preferences in university admissions, ultimately eliminating affirmative action.Harvard has previously said its admission process is consistent with legal precedents that allow universities to consider race as a factor in admissions to obtain the benefits of a diverse student body.Drew Faust, the university’s president, said in a message Tuesday to Harvard students, faculty, staff and alumni that the plaintiffs will paint an “inaccurate image” of the school’s admissions processes and rely on “misleading, selectively presented data taken out of context.” She said Harvard will defend “the processes by which it seeks to create a diverse educational community.” Harvard admitted 4.6% of its 42,749 applicants for the incoming first-year undergraduate class.In a 4-3 ruling upholding the use of racial preferences in public university admissions, Justice Anthony Kennedy left the door open in 2016 to future legal challenges by saying universities must continue to review their affirmative-action policies to assess their positive and negative effects.Many elite colleges have come to Harvard’s defense.The filings, known as motions for summary judgment, will ask the judge to resolve the case without going to trial.The judge has indicated she is unlikely to grant the motions, setting the stage for an Oct.The plaintiffs allege Harvard intentionally discriminates against Asian-Americans by limiting the number of Asian-American students who are admitted and holding them to a higher standard than students of other races.Friday’s motions are likely to include thousands of pages of supporting documents both sides have gathered over the past two years, including dozens of depositions and statistical analyses of detailed admissions data covering six years, during which roughly 200,000 people applied to Harvard.Background The affirmative action debate in the US is a never ending one and the latest controversy surrounds a federal court case that challenges the use of affirmative action in admissions by Harvard.The Wall Street Journal explained the case in June of this year — A closely watched lawsuit accusing Harvard University of discriminating against Asian-American applicants is approaching a critical juncture, as court filings later this week are expected to reveal new details about how the school’s undergraduate admissions process affects different ethnic and racial groups.