In the same way we don’t believe that capitalists should be able to have disproportionate control over economic resources, we don’t think unaccountable state officials and bureaucrats should have the power to control investment and production through ‘socialism from above.’ In some cases, like the former Soviet Union, the failings of such a system are nearly as deep as those of capitalism itself.” flawed than market capitalism.Upon reflection, the authors changed their article to better reflect their actual belief: that “in some cases, like the former Soviet Union, the failings of such a system are as clear as those of capitalism.” The authors’ intention was to point out the failure of authoritarian collectivism to meet the democratic standard of socialism, not to imply a preference for the Soviet Union.It concludes with a call for critical hope and suggestions for building a greater movement for critical pedagogy in Hong Kong by increasing theoretical critical deconstruction of society and education and generating critical construction of practices grounded in the local context.
What ought to scare them is not social-welfare spending on the less fortunate.
The original “Even in Nordic countries, where high levels of state ownership are combined with political democracy and a high standard of living, socialism is a long ways off,” the authors wrote.
Features and problems of renewable energy expansion in Japan under the Feed-in Tariff system and the lessons learned from Germany: Why photovoltaic systems are mostly installed, and why most of deployment centered in the area with low electricity consumption?
"Research on The Residential Choice of Family Caregivers Who Live Near their Caring Elderly Parent in the Suburban Residential Area: The Influence of "Kinkyo(Adult Children Living near their Parents)" on the Sense of Burden of Family Caregivers Why Farmers Keep Growing Vegetables at Forestland?
These changes would be welcome, but socialism moves well beyond them.” It is “a time to be bold,” they wrote.
They don’t seek to reform market capitalism, but to eliminate it: In capitalism, economic power appears separated from political power.published an article arguing that “the spectacular rehabilitation of socialism as a legitimate position within American politics, particularly among young people, is one of the most significant developments for the socialist movement in decades.” I maintain that those young people aren’t being told the whole story.Socialists don’t just want to replace private ownership with state ownership.Either way, let’s play out the vision they described. Readers respond: Would democratic socialism really threaten minorities? Or would you prefer a society in which private businesses can produce birth control, per their preference, in part because individuals possess economic rights as producers and consumers, the preferences of a majority of people around them be damned?Instead of individual capitalists deciding what to produce in their endlessly varied, constantly competing private businesses, “without any democratic input from the rest of society,” control over industry and decisions about what to produce would reside in state planning agencies. How many Muslim prayer rugs would the democratic majority of workers vote to produce? Under capitalism, the mere existence of buyers reliably gives rise to suppliers. If contraception at every CVS and Walgreens sounds better than “popular control,” you may be a laissez-faire capitalist, or at least recognize why democratic socialism can be a nightmare for many sorts of people.Within a Hong Kong educational system orienting individuals and institutions towards local and global market competition, ethnic minority students from families of low socio-economic status face persistent inequities.The chapter highlights critical pedagogy as an intervention, via Bollywood and Nepalese films as vehicles for engaging students, building critical consciousness, and moving students towards transformative forms of resistance.Democratic socialism, at its core, is about deepening democracy where it exists and introducing democracy where it is absent.In countries like the US, that means increasing the scope of popular control in the political arena and broadening it out to include the social and economic spheres.As the rest of the essay makes clear, the authors view democracy as essential to any socialism worthy of the name, and as democratic socialists we condemn all economic and social systems that disempower the vast majority of workers.We regret that our original formulation may have contributed to a misunderstanding of our position.